asp.net - Deploying a Visual Studio website vs web application -


so i'm using visual studio 2010 build website formerly running on php, i'm pretty new environment.

in starting project built website project, not web application project. know generate lot of "never use website project, use web application project instead" comments, bear me.

i'm attempting provide our server team necessary files compile on our server first time. they're used working web application files, not website files.

normally given source code , batch file compiles code deployment directories , move files server there. i'm pretty sure other teams use deployment packages this, isn't option website.

my question is, equivalent steps getting source website ready deploy vs web application? have published website separate folder , has rendered think equivalent in many ways, wanted make sure.

also, possible publish parts of website without others?

please with-hold comments how should using web application instead, google seems assume that's that's used out there too.

thanks!

there isn't deploying web site other copying source files directory in iis. compile site automatically on first page request.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Does gcc have any options to add version info in ELF binary file? -

android - send complex objects as post php java -

charts - What graph/dashboard product is facebook using in Dashboard: PUE & WUE -